Property Tax Assessments in Year One

Date Monday, July 9th, 2007 at 11:50 pm Posts By Ryan Brown

Today I had the pleasure of attempting to protest my property tax assessment at the Travis County Appraisal District. Living in Hyde Park has it’s downside - regardless of the condition of the house, the dirt can be very expensive.

Here is a camera-phone pic of part of the line of eager protestors:
TCAD protest line

It’s a pretty standard setup - Protesters walk in, sign their name, and wait to be called by a TCAD representative. Their home-court/computer advantage is kind of unfair - information asymmetry at its finest I suppose.

In any case, I spent about an hour on Sunday putting together market data to support the fair market value of our home. You can’t argue with data, right? Wrong.

Apparently TCAD’s market data (on which their assessment is based) is superior to my own. Additionally, because we purchased the house in the last 12-months, the only outside data they would consider was the closing statement for our home.

On the surface, this seems fair-ish, and in this case it suits me fine. It is the amount paid by a willing buyer to a willing seller on the open market. However, it seems like this method errs on the side of The Man (wikipedia is awesome!).

For example, lets say you agree to purchase a house for $300k, and the seller agrees to cover $5000 of your closing costs. Based on what I learned today, TCAD would consider the minimum value of your home to be $300k, even though you could argue you really only paid $295k.

Perhaps 3% tax on an extra $5k isn’t a huge deal ($150/yr), however, if the intent of the system is to tax people based on the property value, it seems like more care could be taken to improve the accuracy of the appraisal.

What if Texas adopted a system like California, where property values are set and locked at the purchase price? The upside to this would be that appreciation would no longer endanger the affordability of a persons residence. The downside? This would be a serious disincentive for people to move. For those curious here is a Good article explaining the history of California property taxes.

The moral of the story? If you purchased your property in the past 12-months, you directly set the minimum assessed value in TCAD’s eyes. Don’t bother trying to argue otherwise.

What’s your take on our system? Do you have a fun property tax protest story? Lets hear it.

Related Posts

3 Responses to “Property Tax Assessments in Year One”

  1. Travis County Property Tax Protest Lessons - Part II at InspiredAustin.com Says:
    July 18th, 2007 at 10:32 pm

    [...] you read my previous post about protesting your Travis County tax appraisal, you’d know round 1 didn’t go as planned. As I purchased my home 6 months ago, the only [...]

  2. jenny Says:
    May 29th, 2008 at 5:01 pm

    I got the house for only around 2 months brand new from the builder. They propose a 15% increase on tax rate. The rep laugh at the appraise value and change it right away. A year later, same ridiculus thing happened. They tried to add 10% tax rate. I give them evidence and they told me they only look at their comps and they think 15% increase is more accurate. I disagree with the comp they give because my house was compare to semi-custom homes, but he doesn’t care.

    More houses sold lately, meaning they are already getting more property taxes but they are adding double digit on top of all the extra taxes they are already getting. Where did those money go????

  3. Paul Edwards Says:
    September 16th, 2008 at 10:59 am

    You might find the website http://austin.appraisalminer.com interesting. It allows you to select a subject property and quickly find similar nearby properties. It then displays current year and prior year numbers for appraised values (land, improvement, total) and calculates basic statistical measures comparing the subject property to the similar nearby properties. It also creates graphs and color-coded maps to help you visualize the data. Very helpful in determining if your appraisal passes the “equity” test.

Leave a Reply