<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: McMansion Ordinance Tweaks Possible</title>
	<atom:link href="http://inspiredaustin.com/blog/2007/07/mcmansion-ordinance-tweaks-possible/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://inspiredaustin.com/blog/2007/07/mcmansion-ordinance-tweaks-possible/</link>
	<description>Austin Modern Real Estate, Austin Modern Homes</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 13:02:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Austin McMansion Ordinance consequence &#124; InspiredAustin.com</title>
		<link>http://inspiredaustin.com/blog/2007/07/mcmansion-ordinance-tweaks-possible/#comment-616</link>
		<dc:creator>Austin McMansion Ordinance consequence &#124; InspiredAustin.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 20:41:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inspiredaustin.com/blog/2007/07/mcmansion-ordinance-tweaks-possible/#comment-616</guid>
		<description>[...] McMansion Ordinance Tweaks Possible [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] McMansion Ordinance Tweaks Possible [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura H</title>
		<link>http://inspiredaustin.com/blog/2007/07/mcmansion-ordinance-tweaks-possible/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 14:53:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inspiredaustin.com/blog/2007/07/mcmansion-ordinance-tweaks-possible/#comment-19</guid>
		<description>From the article....it would be great to see that 50% shared wall requirement overturned.  It really seemed as though that was just a direct dig at the MetroHouse concept.  It pretty much guaranteed that any future duplex would have to be a big box preventing creative use of space and the private sanctuary's for the owners.   All of the proposed changes are definitely a step in the right direction if you ask me.  Thanks for the link!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the article&#8230;.it would be great to see that 50% shared wall requirement overturned.  It really seemed as though that was just a direct dig at the MetroHouse concept.  It pretty much guaranteed that any future duplex would have to be a big box preventing creative use of space and the private sanctuary&#8217;s for the owners.   All of the proposed changes are definitely a step in the right direction if you ask me.  Thanks for the link!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
